Perencanaan dan Analisis Implementasi Konsep Bangunan Hijau untuk Gedung Rumah Sakit di Kecamatan Koto Tangah, Kota Padang
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Meningkatnya jumlah fasilitas kesehatan di Indonesia telah mengakibatkan peningkatan konsumsi energi dan air, sementara rumah sakit dituntut untuk beroperasi terus menerus selama 24 jam. Menurut Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), Indonesia memiliki 2.636 rumah sakit umum dan 519 rumah sakit spesialis, yang berkontribusi pada peningkatan konsumsi sumber daya dan produksi limbah non-medis. Oleh karena itu, penerapan konsep bangunan hijau dan rumah sakit hijau telah menjadi kebutuhan strategis untuk pembangunan kesehatan berkelanjutan. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan studi kasus Rumah Sakit Restu Ibu Koto Tangah di Kota Padang, dengan luas bangunan total 4.000 m². Analisis mengevaluasi konsumsi energi, pembangkitan listrik dari sistem tenaga surya fotovoltaik 150 kWp, kebutuhan air bersih, potensi pemanenan air hujan berdasarkan data curah hujan aktual, dan pengurangan emisi karbon. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa desain yang diusulkan dapat mengurangi konsumsi listrik jaringan sebesar 43,9%, memanen sekitar 3.870 m³ air hujan setiap tahun, dan mengurangi emisi karbon sekitar 523 ton CO₂ per tahun. Studi ini merekomendasikan pengoptimalan desain pasif, pengintegrasian pemanenan air hujan dengan sistem penyediaan air bersih, dan mengejar sertifikasi Greenship untuk mendukung kepatuhan terhadap Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia (STARKES).
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referensi
[1] “Statistik Indonesia 2024 - Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.” Accessed: Aug. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/c1bacde03256343b2bf769b0/statistik-indonesia-2024.html
[2] J. Zang, M. Royapoor, K. Acharya, J. Jonczyk, and D. Werner, “Performance gaps of sustainability features in green award-winning university buildings,” Build. Environ., vol. 207, p. 108417, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2021.108417.
[3] F. A. Nasution, Eri Saputra, Rinaldi Mirsa, Soraya Masthura Hassan, Effan Fahrizal, and Athiyatul Ulya, “Pelatihan Teknologi Smart Home Berbasis Ramah Lingkungan,” Jurnal Malikussaleh Mengabdi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 150–158, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.29103/JMM.V4I1.22355.
[4] D. A. Supriyanto Putra, B. W. Harini, R. C. Erianda Putri, S. Mardikus, and P. S. Prabowo, “Solar power control system on smart green home,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 475, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1051/E3SCONF/202447503003.
[5] Ifechukwu Gil-Ozoudeh, Obinna Iwuanyanwu, Azubuike Chukwudi Okwandu, and Chidiebere Somadina Ike, “Sustainable urban design: The role of green buildings in shaping resilient cities,” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 674–692, 2023, doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v5i10.1481.
[6] T. E. Seghier, A. Sepúlveda, Y. W. Lim, and A. Mesloub, “Optimising thermal-daylight performance in tropical open-plan offices: A coupled OTTV and daylight prediction approach,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 98, p. 111369, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.111369.
[7] T. Žižak, S. Medved, and C. Arkar, “Effect of solar photovoltaics on green roof energy balance and evapotranspiration,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 121, p. 106206, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.SCS.2025.106206.
[8] “View of Assessment of Awareness and Knowledge of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation among Residential Building Occupants in Padang City.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journalcendekia.com/asdj/article/view/11/11
[9] C. Gery Buyang and F. A. Sangadji, “PENILAIAN KRITERIA GREEN BUILDING PADA FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS PATTIMURA,” JURNAL SIMETRIK, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 677–682, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.31959/JS.V13I1.1384.
[10] W. L. Ng, A. M. Azmi, N. Y. Dahlan, and K. S. Woon, “Predicting life cycle carbon emission of green office buildings via an integrated LCA- MLR framework,” Energy Build., vol. 316, p. 114345, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2024.114345.
[11] L. Krishna, S. P. Alapati, N. Chaitanya, A. Farrel, S. Rahardhani, and A. B. Putra, “Green building analysis using Greenship for existing building method v.1.1., Case Study of a Campus Building in West Jakarta,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1488, no. 1, p. 012043, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012043.
[12] “View of Multiplication Factor of Actual Compressive Strength Relative to the Predicted Compressive Strength Obtained from Hammer Test Results.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journalcendekia.com/SICEJ/article/view/8/6
[13] “View of Characteristics of Intraslab Earthquake Waves.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journalcendekia.com/SICEJ/article/view/1/2
[14] D. Alves, R. Teixeira, J. Baptista, A. Briga-Sá, and C. Matos, “Optimal Rainwater Harvesting System for a Commercial Building: A Case Study Focusing on Water and Energy Efficiency,” Sustainability 2025, Vol. 17, Page 4584, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 4584, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/SU17104584.
[15] J. Cárdenas-Rangel, G. Osma-Pinto, and J. Jaramillo-Ibarra, “Energy characterization of residential and office buildings in a tropical location,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 5, p. e16048, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E16048.
[16] A. C. H. J. Thebuwena, S. M. S. M. K. Samarakoon, and R. M. C. Ratnayake, “On the Necessity for Improving Water Efficiency in Commercial Buildings: A Green Design Approach in Hot Humid Climates,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 17, p. 2396, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/W16172396/S1.
[17] K. S. Mulya, W. L. Ng, K. Biró, W. S. Ho, K. Y. Wong, and K. S. Woon, “Decarbonizing the high-rise office building: A life cycle carbon assessment to green building rating systems in a tropical country,” Build. Environ., vol. 255, p. 111437, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2024.111437.
[18] “View of Mapping of Individual Preparedness for Earthquakes in Padang City.” Accessed: Aug. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journalcendekia.com/asdj/article/view/12/10